Legal Opinion

In re Omwenga

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided August 16, 2012No. 11-BG—942PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

This matter comes before us upon the report and recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility (“Board”). The Board found that respondent Samuel N. Omwenga committed fifty-eight violations of twenty Rules of Professional Conduct in four consolidated matters. The Board has unanimously recommended to this court that respondent be disbarred based upon his: 1) intentional misappropriation in a matter involving respondent’s client, Dawit Shifaw, and 2) other misconduct, particularly respondent’s flagrant dishonesty, in all four client matters before the Board’s consideration.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Matter of AddamsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. In Re RebackDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. In Re HutchinsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. In Re MicheelDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. In Re PiersonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In re VohraDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. In re Gilbert BaberDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. In re Rodriguez-QuesadaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. In re PetersDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. Raleigh Bynum, IIDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API