Legal Opinion
In re Gilbert Baber
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided January 15, 2015No. 13-BG-1491PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Per curiam
The Board on Professional Responsibility has concluded that respondent Gilbert Baber violated numerous Rules of Professional Conduct during his representation of a client in a probate matter. The Board recommends that Mr. Baber be suspended from the practice of law for a period of three years and be required to prove fitness and to pay restitution as conditions of reinstatement. The Office of Bar Counsel contends that Mr. Baber’s conduct constituted flagrant dishonesty requiring disbarment. We conclude that Mr. Baber should be disbarred.
I
The Board’s report and recommendation rests on the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- In Re GoffeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- In Re CorizziDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
- In Re KanuDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- In Re GubermanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- In re HowesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- In re McClureDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
- IN RE DONALD L. MCCLUREDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
- In re BlackwellDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2026
- In re BlackwellDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2023
- In re ButlerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2025
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.