Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Raleigh Bynum, II

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided December 13, 2018No. 18-BG-341PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

In this case, the Board on Professional Responsibility has adopted the Hearing Committee's factual findings that Mr. Bynum violated multiple rules of professional conduct in connection with his representation in South Carolina of (1) three clients (a son and his parents) in two medical malpractice actions and an estate action, and (2) the son in a life insurance matter. The Board disagrees, however, with the Committee's recommended sanction of a three-year suspension with proof of fitness for reinstatement to the Bar. Based on its determination that Mr. Bynum engaged in flagrant dishonesty,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re VieheDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. In Re PenningtonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. In re VohraDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. In Re PelkeyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. In re McClureDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dugger v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2023
  2. In re JohnsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2023
  3. In re LeFandeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2025
  4. In re Mazingo-MayronneDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2022
  5. In re MoawadDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2022

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API