Legal Opinion
In re Peters
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided November 23, 2016No. 15-BG-699PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Per curiam
On April 10, 2013, after finding that respondent Kristan Peters had violated several professional rules, the Committee on Grievances of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (SDNY Committee) suspended Ms. Peters from the practice of law- for seven years. The-District of Columbia Office of Disciplinary Counsel now recommends that we impose reciprocal discipline and suspend Ms. Peters for five years, with reinstatement conditioned upon proof of fitness to practice law. Although D.C. Bar R. XI, § 11 (e) generally requires this court to impose reciprocal…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Wolters Kluwer Financial Services, Inc. v. ScivantageCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- In Re GoffeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- In Re CaterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- Matter of GoldbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- In Re PetersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re AntonacciDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2026
- In re ButlerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2025
- In re Butler (Amended)District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2025
- In re DomanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2024
- In re KlaymanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2025
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.