Legal Opinion

Kidder v. Miller-Davis Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 1997No. Docket Nos. 105498, 103024, Calendar Nos. 8-9PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMallett, C.J.

We granted leave in these consolidated labor broker cases to determine whether defendant Miller-Davis is a coemployer of the plaintiffs and thus immune from tort liability under the exclusive remedy provision of the Worker’s Disability Compensation Act. In both cases the Court of Appeals affirmed grants of summary disposition in favor of the defendants, holding that the defendant was a customer of Construction Labor Services (cls), a labor broker, and as such was protected from suit under the exclusive remedy provision of the wdca. We affirm and hold further that under the economic-reality…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Renfroe v. Higgins Rack Coating & Manufacturing Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. Farrell v. Dearborn Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Fitzgerald v. Mobil Oil Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1993
  4. Howard v. Dundee Manufacturing Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1992

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Harris v. VernierMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. Clark v. United Technologies Automotive, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Adanalic v. Harco National Insurance CompanyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. James v. Commercial Carriers, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. In re Fedex Ground Package System, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2008

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API