Legal Opinion

Fitzgerald v. Mobil Oil Corp.

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided August 6, 1993No. 2:92-cv-74693PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

FEIKENS, District Judge.

Defendant Mobil Oil Corporation moves for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(b). At a hearing held on June 18, 1993 I took the motion under advisement. Having considered the briefs and oral arguments, I find in favor of Mobil Oil, and dismiss Mobil Oil as a defendant in this case. Plaintiff may proceed against the remaining defendant, Montgomery Tank Lines, Inc.

Plaintiff, a tractor-trailer driver, was injured on the job when he fell from the top of the tanker trailer he used to deliver oil. The trailer was owned by…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Wells v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Flick v. CrouchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  3. Nichol v. BillotMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Renfroe v. Higgins Rack Coating & Manufacturing Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  5. Farrell v. Dearborn Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kidder v. Miller-Davis Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Hix v. Minnesota Workers' Compensation Assigned Risk PlanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
  3. Kidder v. Miller-Davis Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Kidder v. Miller-Davis Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API