Legal Opinion

Clark v. United Technologies Automotive, Inc

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1999No. 108820, Calendar No. 1PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.

This case presents the issue whether defendants Kenneth and Marlene Herzhaft, doing business as Lincoln Engineering Company, were employers of plaintiff Beotis Clark, Jr., at the time of plaintiffs injury and therefore entitled to assert the exclusive remedy provision of the Worker’s Disability Compensation Act, MCL 418.131; MSA 17.237(131), as a defense to a tort action brought by plaintiff. Applying the economic realities test to this dual employer case, we hold that whether defendants were also employers of plaintiff for purposes of the exclusive remedy provision is a question for the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Spiek v. Department of TransportationMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Quinto v. Cross and Peters Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Wells v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Flick v. CrouchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  5. Hoste v. Shanty Creek Management, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1999

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Anwar v. Dow Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
  2. Coblentz v. City of NoviMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Manufacturers Consolidation Service, Inc. v. RodellCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
  4. Reed v. YackellMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Rymal v. BaergenMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API