Legal Opinion

Farrell v. Dearborn Manufacturing Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1982No. Docket Nos. 63267, 64575, 64873, 65119. (Calendar Nos. 1-4)PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFitzgerald, C.J.

Four cases were consolidated on appeal to this Court, all questioning the application of the exclusive remedy provision of the Worker’s Disability Compensation Act. Three cases involve a labor broker situation in which temporary employment is provided to a business customer; one presents an unusual employment relationship of hockey teams and the sports league to which they all belong. To facilitate our analysis, we will deal with the labor broker cases together and separately address the hockey case.

I

Thomas Farrell was sent to work at Dearborn Manufacturing Company by State Labor, Inc. State…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Crilly v. BallouMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Nichol v. BillotMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Renfroe v. Higgins Rack Coating & Manufacturing Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  4. Solakis v. RobertsMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Askew v. MacOmberMichigan Supreme Court · 1976

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. Wells v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Reed v. YackellMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Bechtel v. Crown Cent. Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  4. Harris v. VernierMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. USA Waste of Maryland, Inc. v. LoveDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API