Legal Opinion

Harris v. Vernier

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided October 18, 2000No. Docket 208750PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtZahra, J.

Plaintiff appeals as of right from the trial court’s order granting summary disposition for defendant pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(4) (lack of subject-matter jurisdiction) and dismissing plaintiff’s third-party no-fault claim. We affirm.

The essential facts are not in dispute. In the early morning of September 22, 1995, the parties were driving separate vehicles when they were involved in a collision in the parking lot of a Ford Motor Company plant. Plaintiff and defendant were employees of *308Ford, both having finished their shifts at the plant just before the collision. Plaintiff brought suit,…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Murray v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Wells v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Bowie v. ArderMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Mathis v. Interstate Motor Freight SystemMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Farrell v. Dearborn Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1982

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Travelers Insurance v. Detroit Edison Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Blood v. Qwest Services Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. Southfield Educ. Ass'n v. Bd. of Educ. of the Southfield Pub. Sch.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2017
  4. Begin v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. Tuscany Grove Association v. PerainoMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API