Legal Opinion
Adanalic v. Harco National Insurance Company
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided February 5, 2015No. Docket 317764PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShapiro, J.
In this no-fault action, plaintiff Salko Adanalic sought first-party benefits from defendants Harco National Insurance Company (Harco) and Michigan Millers Mutual Insurance Company (Millers). Spectrum Health Hospitals (Spectrum) and Orthopaedic Associates of Michigan (Orthopaedic), who treated Adanalic’s injuries, intervened as plaintiffs. Plaintiffs and defendants filed cross-motions for summary disposition. The trial court ruled that Millers was liable to plaintiffs for no-fault personal protection insurance (PIP) benefits and, accordingly, awarded damages to plaintiffs. Millers appeals on…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Bush v. ShabahangMichigan Supreme Court · 2009
- Ross v. Auto Club GroupMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
- Perez v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
- Moore v. Secura InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
- Glenn v. TPI Petroleum, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2014
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Beatrice Alghali v. Hanover Insurance CompanyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020
- Centria Home Rehabilitation LLC v. Philadelphia Insurance CompanyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2023
- Daniel Kemp v. Farm Bureau General Insurance Company of MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 2017
- Denice Taylor v. Frankenmuth Mutual Insurance CompanyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
- Evans v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2016
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.