Legal Opinion

Lanning v. Gay

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 1, 1904No. 13,835PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Error from Clay district court; Sam Kimble, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Smith, J. :

The question involved in this proceeding in error is whether or not the husband of a legatee in a will is a competent witness to its execution. The point was raised in the district court in an action brought by the father and sole heir at law of the testatrix, to contest her will, under section 7957, General Statutes of 1901, after it.had been admitted to probate in conformity with the requirements of section 7952, General Statutes of 1901. The law respecting the attestation of wills reads :

“Every last will and testament . . . shall be in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Higbee v. McMillanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
  2. Cornish v. Milwaukee & Lake Winnebago RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Bethany Hospital Co. v. HaleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  4. Lawrie v. LawrieSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
  5. City of Marion v. GanbySupreme Court of Iowa · 1885

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Pee v. CarlyleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
  2. Screeton v. CrumplerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
  3. Stewart v. Marland Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1931
  4. Hess v. EmerySupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  5. Thomas v. HughSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API