Lanning v. Gay
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Clay district court; Sam Kimble, judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Smith, J. :
The question involved in this proceeding in error is whether or not the husband of a legatee in a will is a competent witness to its execution. The point was raised in the district court in an action brought by the father and sole heir at law of the testatrix, to contest her will, under section 7957, General Statutes of 1901, after it.had been admitted to probate in conformity with the requirements of section 7952, General Statutes of 1901. The law respecting the attestation of wills reads :
“Every last will and testament . . . shall be in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Higbee v. McMillanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
- Cornish v. Milwaukee & Lake Winnebago RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
- Bethany Hospital Co. v. HaleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
- Lawrie v. LawrieSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
- City of Marion v. GanbySupreme Court of Iowa · 1885
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Pee v. CarlyleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
- Screeton v. CrumplerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
- Stewart v. Marland Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1931
- Hess v. EmerySupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
- Thomas v. HughSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.