Legal Opinion
State v. Helm
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided October 21, 1959No. 6692PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STANFORD, Superior Court Judge.
This is a condemnation proceeding instituted by the State for the purpose of acquiring a portion of the property of the defendants needed in the process of widening and reconstructing the existing PhoenixCordes Junction Highway.
On November 4, 1957, the trial court awarded defendants Elton C. Mcjunkin and Marjorie P. Mcjunkin, the owners of the fee, a judgment against the State for the sum of $33,000 as damages for the taking of their interest in the real property. There was no appeal from the judgment and appellant is now the fee owner of the property sought to…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Danforth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Morton Butler Timber Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1937
- Pool v. ButlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- United States v. Sunset Cemetery Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943
- Kahlen v. . State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- City of Casa Grande v. Arizona Water Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
- City of Tucson v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
- Dabrowski v. BartlettCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
- Housing Authority v. AmslerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965
- City of Sedona v. DevolCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.