Legal Opinion

Phoenix Indemnity Co. v. Willard

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 27, 1955PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEINFELD, District' Judge.

This is an action to restrain the enforcement of, and to vacate, a compensation order issued by the defendant Deputy Commissioner pursuant to the Defense Base Compensation Act, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 1651-1654, which extends to employment at certain defense base areas the coverage of the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act, 33 U.S.C.A. § 901 et seq.

There are now before the Court for decision renewed cross-motions by the respective parties for summary judgment predicated on the Deputy Commissioner’s order of July 14, 1954 which contains a “Modification of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Cardillo v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Voehl v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. Beaudry v. WatkinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Ward v. CardilloCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
  5. Schmiedeke v. Four Wheel Drive Auto Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1927

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Moore v. GundelfingerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. Filson v. Bell Tel. Labs., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964
  3. Omni Air International v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation ProgramsDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API