Legal Opinion

Moore v. Gundelfinger

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided October 9, 1974No. Docket 18092PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolbrook, P. J.

This case arises as an appeal from determination of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board* 1 which upheld a decision of a compensation referee denying benefits to plaintiff.

In early 1970 plaintiff Betty Moore, who had recently finished a beautician’s course in Petoskey, Michigan, was contacted, at her home in Levering, Michigan, by defendant Jan Gundelfinger concerning possible employment with Gundel’s Hairdressers (a partnership of defendant Jan Gundelfinger and her husband defendant W. T. Gundelfinger) in Battle Creek, Michigan. Plaintiff went to Harbor Springs, Michigan, where she…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Laeng v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. McKissic v. BodineMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. Medacco v. Campbell, Wyant & Cannon Foundry Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. McClary v. WagonerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  5. Carter v. Kelsey-Hayes CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 1972

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Childs v. Kalgin Island LodgeAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Younger v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  3. Great West Casualty Co. v. BergesonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Frammolino v. Richmond Products Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. Gibbs v. Keebler CompanyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API