Legal Opinion

Filson v. Bell Tel. Labs., Inc.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided January 28, 1964PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

82 N.J. Super. 185 (1964)

197 A.2d 196

MITZI FILSON, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,

v.

BELL TELEPHONE LABORATORIES, INCORPORATED, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued January 16, 1964.

Decided January 28, 1964.

Before Judges GOLDMANN, KILKENNY and COLLESTER.

Mr. W. Clark Gaw argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Mead, Gleeson, Hansen & Pantages, attorneys; Mr. Gaw, of counsel).

Mr. Aaron Gordon argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Hirschberg, Nashel, Zorn & Cronson, attorneys; Mr. Gordon, of counsel; Mr. Louis L. Cronson, on the brief).

The opinion of the court…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Russo v. United States Trucking Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  2. Mazzuchelli v. SilberbergSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
  3. Gotkin v. WeinbergSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
  4. Ricciardi v. Marcalus Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  5. Sala v. American Sumatra Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1918

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Cavalcante v. Lockheed Electronics Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964
  2. Hebrank v. ParsonsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
  3. Farris Engineering Corporation v. The Service Bureau CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
  4. Norse Petroleum A/S v. LVO International, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1978
  5. Rivera v. Green Giant Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1966

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API