Legal Opinion
Voehl v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North America
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided February 6, 1933No. 315PublishedCited by 192 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Hughes
By the Act of Congress of May 17, 1928 (45 Stat. 600, D. C. Code, Tit. 19, §§ 11, 12), the provisions of the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act (33 U. S. C., §§ 901-950) are made applicable to employees, as stated, in the District of Columbia. Petitioner, Karl E. Voehl, an employee of the National Electrical Supply Company, which was engaged in business in the District, filed a claim for compensation for an injury sustained through an automobile accident while he was on his way to his employer’s place of business on Sunday, April 6, 1930, for the purpose, according to his…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- McNicol's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Cudahy Packing Co. Of Nebraska v. ParramoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Claim of Dependents of Marks v. GrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Bountiful Brick Co. v. GilesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by192 opinions
- Cardillo v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- South Chicago Coal & Dock Co. v. BassettSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Del Vecchio v. BowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Parker v. Motor Boat Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Norton v. Warner Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
187 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.