Legal Opinion
Ward v. Cardillo
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided April 19, 1943No. 8275PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGroner, C. J.
This is a compensation case under the Longshoremen’s Act 1 in which the Deputy Commissioner rejected the claim. The District Court affirmed and the claimant appeals.
The uncontradicted evidence shows that the claimant lived in Loudoun County, Virginia, some forty miles from Washington, on the high road between Winchester and Washington. Prior to the end of the year 1940 he was in the habit of driving his own car to and from work, reporting each morning at 7 o’clock and leaving each evening around 6 or 6:30. Toward the end of 1940 he expressed dissatisfaction with his salary and requested an…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Cudahy Packing Co. Of Nebraska v. ParramoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Bountiful Brick Co. v. GilesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Voehl v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Lake v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- Scott v. WillisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1928
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Cardillo v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- H. K. Ferguson Co. v. WilleyWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
- Dixie Sand & Gravel Corporation v. Pauline HollandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1958
- Pribyl v. Standard Electric CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1954
- United States of America and Jeanette E. Gondeck, Intervenor v. Pan American World Airways Incorporated and the Travelers Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.