Legal Opinion

Weisblat v. City of San Diego

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 18, 2009No. D052787PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

NARES, Acting P. J.

INTRODUCTION

The principal issue we must decide is whether a 2004 levy imposed by the City of San Diego (the City), without a vote of the electorate, for the primary purpose of recovering the cost of collecting and administering a general tax called the “Rental Unit Business Tax,” is a fee or rather a void general or special tax that should have been approved by a vote of the electorate as required by the California Constitution. We hold that this levy is a general tax that is void because it was not approved by a majority vote of the municipal electorate as required…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Amador Valley Joint Union High School District v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Saelzler v. Advanced Group 400California Supreme Court · 2001
  4. City and County of San Francisco v. FarrellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Sinclair Paint Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. California Cannabis Coalition v. City of UplandCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
  2. CHIATELLO v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  3. Citizens for Fair REU Rates v. City of ReddingCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Borikas v. Alameda Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  5. Building Industry Ass'n of the Bay Area v. City of San RamonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API