Legal Opinion

Borikas v. Alameda Unified School District

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 6, 2013No. A129295PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*139Opinion

BANKE, J.—

I. Introduction

This case involves the validity of a parcel tax approved by Alameda Unified School District (District) voters in June 2008 as Measure H. The issue before us is whether the tax violates Government Code section 50079, which authorizes school districts to levy “qualified special taxes.” (Gov. Code, § 50079, subd. (a).)1 Such taxes are statutorily defined as “taxes that apply uniformly to all taxpayers or all real property within the school district, except that ‘qualified special taxes’ may include taxes that provide for an exemption from those taxes for taxpayers…

2Cases cited57 opinions

  1. Amador Valley Joint Union High School District v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Varian Medical Systems, Inc. v. DelfinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Santa Clara County Local Transportation Authority v. GuardinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. People v. KnollerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Kavanaugh v. West Sonoma County Union High School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Vivid Entertainment v. Jonathan FieldingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  2. City of San Diego v. ShapiroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  3. Golden Gate Hill Development Co. v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. ECC Capital Corp. v. Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  5. Johnson v. Cnty. of Mendocino, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API