California Cannabis Coalition v. City of Upland
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Cuéllar, J.
Here we consider the interplay of two constitutional provisions. First, sections 8 and 11 of article II of the state Constitution contain the people's initiative power, which we have described as " 'one of the most precious rights of our democratic process.' " ( Associated Home Builders etc., Inc. v. City of Livermore (1976) 18 Cal.3d 582 , 591, 135 Cal.Rptr. 41 , 557 P.2d 473 ( Associated Home Builders ); Cal. Const., art. II (article II), §§ 8 [statewide power], 11 [local power].) Second, article XIII C-added by one of several successful initiative constitutional amendments…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Whitman v. American Trucking Assns., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Kwikset Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- People v. Lance W.California Supreme Court · 1985
- Associated Home Builders of Greater Eastbay, Inc. v. City of LivermoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- People v. CarbajalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by99 opinions
- In re Edwards, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- People v. GonzalesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
- People v. JimenezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2020
- In re GadlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 2020
- Cleveland Nat'l Forest Found. v. San Diego Ass'n of Governments, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.