Sinclair Paint Co. v. State Board of Equalization
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CHIN, J.
In 1991, by simple majority vote, the Legislature enacted the Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention Act of 1991 (the Act) (Stats. 1991, ch. 799, § 3, amended Stats. 1995, ch. 415, § 5; see Health & Saf. Code, *870§ 105275 et seq.).1 The Act provided evaluation, screening, and medically necessary follow-up services for children who were deemed potential victims of lead poisoning. The Act’s program was entirely supported by “fees” assessed on manufacturers or other persons contributing to environmental lead contamination. (See §§ 105305, 105310.) The question arises whether these fees…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Pennell v. City of San JoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Amador Valley Joint Union High School District v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Western Indemnity Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- City and County of San Francisco v. FarrellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Ehrlich v. City of Culver CityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by81 opinions
- Cal. Building Industry Assn. v. State Water Resources Control Bd.California Supreme Court · 2018
- Jacks v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
- Apartment Ass'n of L.A. Cty. Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- California Farm Bureau Federation v. State Water Resources Control BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- In Re Attorney Discipline SystemCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.