Legal Opinion

Fortna v. Martin

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 24, 1958No. Civ. 9214PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchottky, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment enjoining defendant, for a period of five years, from “entering into competition, directly or indirectly, with plaintiff . . . and/or soliciting structural pest control work, all in the exterminating business, Branch 3, Group D termite control work,” in a specified area of the Sacramento Valley, and from “making use of confidential information or trade secrets of said plaintiff, . . . and in particular from making any disclosure whatsoever as to said plaintiff’s methods of bidding for structural pest control work.”

On December 21, 1953, defendant Martin and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Continental Car-Na-Var Corp. v. MoseleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Guggenhime & Co. v. LamantiaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  3. New Method Laundry Co. v. MacCannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  4. California Intelligence Bureau v. CunninghamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. Pasadena Ice Co. v. ReederCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Whyte v. Schlage Lock CompanyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  2. Hollingsworth Solderless Terminal Co., a Corporation v. William Turley, an Individual and Hoffman Electronics Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  3. Swenson v. FileCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Sarkes Tarzian, Inc. v. Audio Devices, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1958
  5. Uribe v. HowieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API