Legal Opinion
California Intelligence Bureau v. Cunningham
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 9, 1948No. Civ. 15853PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VALLEE, J. pro tem.
Appeal from a judgment enjoining defendant from engaging in unfair trade practices.
Plaintiff or its predecessor for more than 23 years has been engaged in a unique business in Los Angeles. According to the evidence, it is now and during the years has been the only concern engaged in a similar business in Los Angeles. The business consists in procuring, digesting and analyzing information concerning solicitations of funds for charity, for philanthropic, commercial or civic enterprises, benefits, campaigns, drives of all sorts, sales of tickets and advertising space by…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Continental Car-Na-Var Corp. v. MoseleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Tuttle v. BuckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
- Empire Steam Laundry v. LozierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Guggenhime & Co. v. LamantiaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Pasadena Ice Co. v. ReederCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Diodes, Inc. v. FranzenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Hollingsworth Solderless Terminal Co., a Corporation v. William Turley, an Individual and Hoffman Electronics Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Aetna Building Maintenance Co. v. WestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Town & Country House & Homes Service, Inc. v. EvansSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
- Rosicrucian Fellowship v. Rosicrucian Fellowship Non-Sectarian ChurchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.