Legal Opinion

Whyte v. Schlage Lock Company

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 12, 2002No. G028382PublishedCited by 110 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FYBEL, J.

The doctrine of inevitable disclosure permits a trade secret owner to prevent a former employee from working for a competitor despite the owner’s failure to prove the employee has taken or threatens to use trade secrets. Under that doctrine, the employee may be enjoined by demonstrating the employee’s new job duties will inevitably cause the employee to rely upon knowledge of the former employer’s trade secrets. No published California decision has accepted or rejected the inevitable disclosure doctrine.

In this opinion, we reject the inevitable disclosure doctrine. We hold…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. MAI Systems Corp. v. Peak Computer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  2. Davey v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Duncan v. StuetzleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  4. County of Alameda v. CarlesonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Pepsico, Inc., a Corporation v. William E. Redmond, Jr., and the Quaker Oats Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by110 opinions

  1. Electronic Arts, Inc. v. United States District CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  2. Comedy Club, Inc. v. Improv West AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  3. Hoover v. American Income Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  4. Central Valley General Hospital v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  5. LeJeune v. Coin Acceptors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2004

105 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API