Legal Opinion
United States v. State of South Dakota
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided December 9, 1981No. 80-2038PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McMILLIAN, Circuit Judge.
The State of South Dakota appeals from a final judgment 1 entered in the District Court for the District of South Dakota 2 declaring a housing project located in the City of Sisseton, South Dakota, to be a “dependent Indian community” within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 1151(b), 3 and restraining the State of South Dakota from asserting jurisdiction over the project.
In this appeal the state argues that the district court erred in (1) not considering the entire City of Sisseton, rather than the project, as the proper community of reference, and (2) finding that the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Hormel v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- DeCoteau v. District County Court for the Tenth Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- California v. ByersSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. JohnSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- United States v. Anthony Damian AzureCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- Rosebud Sioux Tribe v. A & P Steel, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
- Lewis v. Sac & Fox Tribe of Oklahoma Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- Pittsburg & Midway Coal Mining Co. v. WatchmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Pittsburg & Midway Coal Mining Company v. Kee Ike Yazzie, Roselyn D. John, Romero Brown, Lewis Calamity, Peter J. Korth, and David C. BruntCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.