Legal Opinion
Rosebud Sioux Tribe v. A & P Steel, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided June 4, 1984No. 83-1748, 82-2187 and 82-2217PublishedCited by 157 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FLOYD R. GIBSON, Senior Circuit Judge.
The plaintiff, 1 the Rosebud Sioux Tribe (Tribe), sued the defendant, A & P Steel, Inc. (A & P), in United States District Court for the District of South Dakota. 2 The suit sought damages for fraud, conspiracy, breach of contract and breach of warranties arising out of a contract for the development of an irrigation system on land owned by the Tribe. 3 The jury returned a verdict for A & P. A judgment dismissing the Tribe’s complaint, and awarding over seventy-four thousand dollars to A & P on its counterclaim, was entered on August 27, 1982. The Tribe…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Elkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Baxter v. PalmigianoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by157 opinions
- Johnson v. Dayton Electric Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- Edith Libutti, Doing Business as Lion Crest Stable, a Sole Proprietorship v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Barbara Jean Johnson, Cross-Appellant v. Offshore Express, Inc., Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- Davis v. The Mutual Life Insurance Company Of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- Rhonda Callanan v. Marvin T. Runyun, Postmaster General, United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
152 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.