Legal Opinion

Pittsburg & Midway Coal Mining Company v. Kee Ike Yazzie, Roselyn D. John, Romero Brown, Lewis Calamity, Peter J. Korth, and David C. Brunt

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided August 3, 1990No. 88-2413, 88-8071PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHEN H. ANDERSON, Circuit Judge.

This case raises the question of whether a 1907-08 addition to the Navajo Reservation of nearly 1.9 million acres in northwestern New Mexico was terminated by two Executive Orders issued in 1908 and 1911. * The plain tiff-appellant is the Pitts-burg and Midway Coal Mining Company (“P & M”), whose South McKinley mine is on the land in question and whose “source gains” from the mine’s coal sales are taxed by the defendant Navajo Tribe Tax Commission (“Tribe”). P & M has paid the tax under protest since 1986. Reply Brief at 20 n. 17. P & M filed an action in…

2Cases cited69 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Picard v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Pullman-Standard v. SwintSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Anderson v. HarlessSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. United States v. MazurieSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Dana Leigh Thompson v. County of Franklin, William A. Hughes, Treasurer of Franklin CountyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  2. Hagen v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Murphy v. RoyalCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
  4. Pittsburg & Midway Coal Mining Co. v. WatchmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  5. HRI, Inc. v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API