DeCoteau v. District County Court for the Tenth Judicial District
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stewart
These two cases, consolidated for decision, raise the single question whether the Lake Traverse Indian Reservation in South Dakota, created by an 1867 treaty between the United States and the Sisseton and Wahpeton bands of Sioux Indians, was terminated and returned to *427the public domain, by the Act of March 3, 1891, c. 543, 26 Stat. 1035. In each of the two cases, the South Dakota courts asserted jurisdiction over members of the Sisseton-Wahpeton Tribe for acts done on lands which, though within the 1867 reservation borders, have been owned and settled by non-Indians since the 1891 Act. The…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Worcester v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
- Williams v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- McClanahan v. Arizona State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Carpenter v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Mattz v. ArnettSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by433 opinions
- California v. Cabazon Band of Mission IndiansSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Oliphant v. Suquamish Indian TribeSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- McGirt v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 2020
- Puyallup Tribe, Inc. v. Department of Game of WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Fisher v. District Court of the Sixteenth Judicial District of MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
428 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.