Legal Opinion

Lewis v. Sac & Fox Tribe of Oklahoma Housing Authority

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 9, 1994No. 78825PublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPALA, Justice.

The two issues presented by this appeal are: [1] Has Congress affirmatively ousted state courts of their concurrent jurisdiction to entertain contract actions involving land transactions between Indian buyers and state-created Indian housing authorities? and if not [2] Do the terms of the Mutual Help and Occupancy Agreement between the Indian plaintiffs and the state-created Indian housing authority express an intent to convey both the surface and mineral estates to the plaintiffs? We answer the first question in the negative and the second in the affirmative.

I

THE ANATOMY OF…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. United States v. CausbySupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Williams v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. Charles Dowd Box Co. v. CourtneySupreme Court of the United States · 1962

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. Akin v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
  2. Pitco Production Co. v. Chaparral Energy, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
  3. Aliron International, Inc. v. Cherokee Nation Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
  4. Faith United Methodist Church & Cemetery of Terra Alta v. MorganWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Hoover v. Kiowa Tribe of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API