Legal Opinion

Pittsburg & Midway Coal Mining Co. v. Watchman

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided April 19, 1995No. 94-2060PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN P. MOORE, Circuit Judge.

This case represents the second time this controversy has appeared before us. In 1986, the Pittsburg & Midway Coal Mining Company (P & M) filed an action in federal court seeking an injunction and declaratory judgment that the Navajo Nation lacked jurisdiction to impose its Business Activities Tax on the “source gains” from P & M’s South McKinley Mine.1 The Navajo Nation replied the federal court should abstain based on the tribal abstention doctrine, allowing the tribal court to hear the issue first. The Tribe offered two different theories in support of its…

2Cases cited70 opinions

  1. Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. McKart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Santa Clara Pueblo v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Hormel v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. Kerr-McGee Corp. v. FarleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
  2. Gaylor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  3. Gaylor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  4. Kennedy v. LubarCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
  5. Manzanares v. HigdonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API