Legal Opinion

Hormel v. Helvering

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 17, 1941No. 257PublishedCited by 1,340 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Black

The Commissioner of Internal Revenue assessed a deficiency against petitioner for failure to include in his 1934 and 1935 tax returns the income of three separate trusts declared by him in 1934. Each of the declarations of trust recited that the beneficiaries were “Jay C. Hormel [petitioner himself], and Germaine D. Hormel, his wife, as guardian for their son,” a different son being designated by each trust instrument. Each trust estate consisted of shares of stock in Geo. A. Hormel & Co., of which petitioner was an officer. Petitioner named himself and another as co-trustees; all dividends,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Helvering v. CliffordSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Helvering v. GowranSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. Vandenbark v. Owens-Illinois Glass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Helvering v. Tex-Penn Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  5. General Utilities & Operating Co. v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1935

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1,340 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Woodford v. NgoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. United States v. W. R. Walters, United States of America v. Two Hundred Sixty-Two FirearmsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
  4. Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Sims v. ApfelSupreme Court of the United States · 2000

1,335 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API