Legal Opinion
Okmulgee Supply Co. v. Rotman
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided July 8, 1930No. 19572PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HERR, C.
On the 6th day of March, 1924, Hyman Rotman, an employee of the Oil State Pipe Company, while engaged in the course of his employment, was injured by and through the alleged negligence of the servants and employees of the Okmulgee Supply Company. He elected to take compensation of the Oil State Company as provided by Workmen’s Compensation Act, section 7302, C. O. S. 1921, and compensation was awarded him thereunder. The New Amsterdam Casualty Company was insurance carrier for said Oil State Company and paid said award. Action was thereafter brought by it and Rotman, jointly, to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kansas City, M. & O. Ry. Co. v. ShuttSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Colonial Refining Co. v. LathropSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- State Exch. Bank of Elk City v. National Bank of Commerce of St. LouisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Tucker v. HudsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Niblo v. Drainage Dist. No. 3Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
3Cited by8 opinions
- Krametbauer v. McDonaldNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1940
- Hanna v. Brictson Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
- Stanley v. SweetSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
- Barton v. HarmonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
- Hunt v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.