Kansas City, M. & O. Ry. Co. v. Shutt
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Woods Countyj J. L.' Pancoast, Judge. Action by Franklin Shutt against the Kansas City, Mexico & Orient Eailway Company. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error. On the 26th day of December, 1903, the defendant in error, Franklin Shutt, and the St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Com1 pany, as plaintiffs, began in the district court of Woods county, Oída.
Read the full summary
Error from District Court, Woods Countyj J. L.' Pancoast, Judge. Action by Franklin Shutt against the Kansas City, Mexico & Orient Eailway Company. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error. On the 26th day of December, 1903, the defendant in error, Franklin Shutt, and the St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Com1 pany, as plaintiffs, began in the district court of Woods county, Oída. T., an action against the plaintiff in error, the Kansas City, Mexico & Orient Eailway Company, as defendant, declaring on an action for damages on account of the alleged destruction of a barn, grain, and other…
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
In this case the alleged assignment to the insurance company purported to cover only that portion of the loss paid the assured (assignor) by the assurer.
Section 4224 (Code Civ. Proc. § 26) Wilson’s Rev. &' Ann. St. Okla. 1903, was borrowed from, Kansas. Section 4103, (Code Civ. Proc. § 26) Gen. St. Kan. 1889 (Gen. St. Kan. 1868, c. 80, § 26). At the time said section was adopted by the Legislature of Oklahoma Territorj', section 4516, Gen. St. Kan. 1889 (Code Civ. -Proc. § 420), provided:
“In addition to the causes of action which survive at common law, causes of action for mesne profits, or…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. Commercial Union InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Hall & Long v. Railroad Cos.Supreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Chicago, St. Louis & New Orleans Railroad v. Pullman Southern Car Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. New York & New Haven RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1856
- Choctaw, O. G. R. Co. v. BurgessSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- American Fidelity & Casualty Co., Inc. v. All American Bus Lines, IncCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Associates Transports, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
- Minnetonka Oil Co. v. Cleveland Vitrified Brick Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Powell v. . Water Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
- Motsenbocker v. Shawnee Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.