Colonial Refining Co. v. Lathrop
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Payne County; A. H. Huston, Judge. Action by Marvin Lathrop against the Colonial Refining Company, a corporation. There, was a judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error. '
1Opinion of the Court
’ BRETT, J.
On February 9, 1914, Marvin •Lathrop, the defendant in error, filed suit in the district court of Payne county, against the plaintiff in error, the Colonial Refining Company, a corporation, to recpver damages in the sum of $10,000 for personal injuries, alleged to have been sustained by Lathrop while in the employ of the said corporation. The parties will be referred to in this opinion as they appeared in the court below: that is, Lathrop, defendant in error, will be referred to as plaintiff, and the Colonial Refining Company will be referred to as‘defendant. The plaintiff alleged…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Washington v. B. & O. R. R.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1880
- Cogdell v. Wilmington & Weldon RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
- Birsch v. Citizens' Electric Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1908
- Montgomery Gas-Light Co. v. Montgomery & Eufaula Railway Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1888
- Wastl v. Montana Union Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1900
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Fulton v. Chouteau County Farmers' Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1934
- Schaff v. CoyleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Empire Oil & Refining Co. v. FieldsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- Roberts v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1946
- Langley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1950
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.