Legal Opinion

Tucker v. Hudson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 3, 1913No. 2673PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Error from County Court, Pawnee County; N. E. McNeil, Judge. Action by Frank Hudson and others against A. W. Tucker. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant Tucker brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtHayes, C. J.

This proceeding in error is prosecuted from a joint judgment against plaintiff in error and defendants in error, Arkansas Valley Townsite Company and H. C. Hannah, in favor of defendant in error Frank Hudson for a specific sum of money and for costs. To the petition in error is attached both a ease-made and a transcript of the record. The case-made was never served upon defendants in error Arkansas Valley Townsite Company and H. C. Hannah. It is therefore void, and no question which is attempted to be presented by the case-made can be considered. National Surety Co. v. Okla. Presbyterian…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. National Surety Co. v. Oklahoma Presbyterian College for GirlsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Woodman v. DavisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884
  3. Betz v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1906
  4. State Ex Rel. Hankins, Co. Atty. v. HoltSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  5. Bourland v. Madill State BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Meshek v. CordesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  2. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Barton v. HarmonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  4. O'Neill v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  5. Shawnee Life Ins. Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API