Legal Opinion
Hunt v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 23, 1968No. 41618PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAVISON, Justice.
Charles Hunt (plaintiff below) appeals from a judgment rendered on a jury verdict in favor of Firestone Tire & Rubber Co., (defendants below) in an action to recover for personal injuries suffered by plaintiff when an alleged defective tire manufactured by Firestone and placed on a new Pontiac automobile by General Motors Corporation, blew out and caused the automobile plaintiff was driving to run off the highway. Plaintiff also appeals from a further adverse judgment, denying him any recovery against the other defendants, when the trial court sustained motions for directed…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Colonial Refining Co. v. LathropSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Emmett W. Pryor and Pacific Employers Insurance Company v. Lee C. Moore, CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1959
- Munroe v. Schoenfeld & Hunter Drilling Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Hembree v. Southard Ex Rel. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
- S. H. Kress & Co. v. MaddoxSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Runyon v. ReidSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
- Ruiz v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1981
- Johnson v. Mid-South Sports, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
- Worsham v. NixCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2003
- Richey v. Cherokee Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.