State Exch. Bank of Elk City v. National Bank of Commerce of St. Louis
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Beckham County ; T. P. Clay, Judge. Action by the National Bank of Commerce of St. Louis, Mo., as plaintiff, against D. A. Mayer and Calvin M. Rosser, as defendants, in which the State Exchange Bank of Elk City is interpleaded by said defendants. Prom judgment, in favor of defendants, Mayer and Rosser, and against the inter-pleader, the State Exchange Bank of Elk City brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
STEWART, C.
The plaintiff, National Bank of Commerce of St. Louis, brought its action as the alleged holder in due course of a negotiable promissory note signed by D. A. Mayer and indorsed by Calvin M. Rosser, payable to the order of State Exchange Bank of Elk City, the action being against Mayer and Rosser as defendants. Mayer and Rosser filed answer to the petition, and also filed cross-petition against State Exchange Bank of Elk City, and asked that the State Exchange Bank of Elk City be made a party to the action. As grounds for defense and for cause of action against the State…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Choctaw, O. G. R. Co. v. BurgessSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Hurd v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1891
3Cited by17 opinions
- Cressler v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Conqueror Trust Co. v. Bayless Drug Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Stanley v. SweetSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
- Cockrell v. MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Okmulgee Supply Co. v. RotmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.