Legal Opinion

Niblo v. Drainage Dist. No. 3

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 10, 1916No. 6941PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error from District Court, Oklahoma County;Geo. W. Clark, Judge. Action by Sarah E. Niblo against Drainage District No. 3 and the Board of County Commissioners of Oklahoma County. Judgment. for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtTurner, J.

On April 10, 1914, Sarah E. Niblo, plaintiff in error, sued drainage district No. 3 and board of county commissioners of Oklahoma county to recover damages for the construction of a drainage ditch through her land. She alleged that her lands had been rendered practically valueless by the construction of a ditch through same; that .she had no notice of the construction of such ditch, nor an opportunity to be heard, étc. On the 5th day of June thereafter she filed her amended petition against same parties, and alleged practically the same grounds, except she further alleged that no drainage…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Stinchcomb v. PattesonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  2. Prairie Oil & Gas Co. v. KinneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  3. Mainard v. FowlerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Okmulgee Supply Co. v. RotmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  5. Montgomery v. KrouchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API