Legal Opinion

Pfister v. Brown

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1972No. 4069PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McINTYRE, Chief Justice.

Action was brought in the district court of Campbell County for reformation of an instrument due to a scrivener’s error. Judgment was rendered for the defendant and plaintiffs have appealed.

Because the evidence was such that the trial judge, as trier, had sufficient reason to find plaintiffs had not clearly shown a mutual mistake through a scrivener’s error, we find it necessary to uphold the judgment of the district court. A brief review of the evidence and undisputed facts will demonstrate why we hold as we do.

In 1941 John E. Pfister and wife agreed to sell 12,227…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Davis v. KleindienstArizona Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Witzel v. WitzelWyoming Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Grieve v. GrieveWyoming Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Schnug v. SchnugSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
  5. Weatherford v. WEATHERFORDOregon Supreme Court · 1953

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Crompton v. BruceWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Rainbow Oil Co. v. ChristmannWyoming Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Raymond v. SteenWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Gasaway v. ReiterWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Patel v. HarlessWyoming Supreme Court · 1996

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API