Legal Opinion

Witzel v. Witzel

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 1963No. 3154PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Harnsberger

Plaintiff brought action to quiet her title to the entire estate in certain lands and to the surface estate only in other lands, claiming a deed to her former husband Albert W. Witzel and herself, while they were man and wife, created in them a joint tenancy with survivorship and that upon Albert’s death she had succeeded to those entire estates. It was stipulated that defendants Maurice W. Witzel and Una Witzel Watkins, children of Albert and plaintiff, did not resist plaintiff’s claim. Following trial without jury, the court construed the deed under which plaintiff claimed title as having…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Van Renesselaer v. KearneySupreme Court of the United States · 1851
  2. In Re the Estate of BlumenthalNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  3. Dimock v. CorwinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938
  4. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  5. Allen v. AlmySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1913

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. MULLINNIX LLC v. HKB Royalty TrustWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
  2. In Re Ogburn's EstateWyoming Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Zubrod v. DuncanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
  4. Mamalis v. BornovasSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1972
  5. Choman v. EpperleyWyoming Supreme Court · 1979

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API