Legal Opinion

Crompton v. Bruce

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided September 23, 1983No. 83-61PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROSE, Justice.

The trial court granted the plaintiffs relief: reformation of the disputed quitclaim deed and quiet title to the mineral estate. We will affirm.

FACTS

The real estate transactions of concern here involve three families: Robert and Karol Bruce, husband and wife; Warren and Louise Adamson, husband and wife; and Clarence and Kelly Crompton, father and son. The Bruces, plaintiffs below and ap-pellees here, are the sellers of the Wyoming property and buyers of the Idaho property. Appellants Adamsons are the Idaho sellers. Appellants Cromptons are the Wyoming buyers.

In the course of…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Distad v. CubinWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Madrid v. NortonWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Douglas Reservoirs Water Users Ass'n v. CrossWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
  4. MacGuire v. Harriscope Broadcasting Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Laird v. LairdWyoming Supreme Court · 1979

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. In Re Rights to Use Water in Big Horn RiverWyoming Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. WashingtonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
  3. Ely v. KirkWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Glenn J. Gumpel and Merrily Gumpel, Trustees of the Glenn and Merrily Gumpel Family Trust Dated October 8, 2001 v. Copperleaf Homeowners Association, Inc., a Wyoming Non-Profit Corporation Roderick Fuller and Kathleen A. Fuller, Trustees of the Roderick and Kathleen Fuller Family Trust Dated January 16, 1997 Mooncrest Ranch A/K/A Mooncrest Ranch, Inc., a Wyoming Corporation Successor By Merger To Rocking M Ranch, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Britton v. Bill Anselmi Pontiac-Buick-GMC, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1990

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API