Patel v. Harless
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MACY, Justice.
Appellant Piyush Patel appeals from the judgment which was entered in favor of Ap-pellees Keith Harless (Keith) and Harvey Harless (Harvey), who were doing business as H & H Drywall. The trial court found that a mutual mistake had occurred in the formation of the parties’ contract.
We reverse.
ISSUES
Patel requests our review of the following issues:
I. Whether the evidence presented at trial supports a finding of mutual mistake[.]
II. Whether Appellees assumed the risk[.]
FACTS
In 1993, Patel contracted with Paragon Management Inc. to provide management services for a construction…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Cordova v. GosarWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
- Amoco Production Co. v. Stauffer Chemical Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1980
- Examination Management Services, Inc. v. KirschbaumWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
- Shrum v. ZeltwangerWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
- Fleetham v. SchneeklothWashington Supreme Court · 1958
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Snyder v. LovercheckWyoming Supreme Court · 1999
- Mantle v. N. Star Energy & Constr. LLCWyoming Supreme Court · 2019
- Kirkwood v. Cuna Mutual Ins. SocietyWyoming Supreme Court · 1997
- Lee v. LPP Mortgage Ltd.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2003
- Mathis v. WendlingWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.