Legal Opinion

Patel v. Harless

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1996No. 96-67PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MACY, Justice.

Appellant Piyush Patel appeals from the judgment which was entered in favor of Ap-pellees Keith Harless (Keith) and Harvey Harless (Harvey), who were doing business as H & H Drywall. The trial court found that a mutual mistake had occurred in the formation of the parties’ contract.

We reverse.

ISSUES

Patel requests our review of the following issues:

I. Whether the evidence presented at trial supports a finding of mutual mistake[.]

II. Whether Appellees assumed the risk[.]

FACTS

In 1993, Patel contracted with Paragon Management Inc. to provide management services for a construction…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Cordova v. GosarWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Amoco Production Co. v. Stauffer Chemical Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Examination Management Services, Inc. v. KirschbaumWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Shrum v. ZeltwangerWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Fleetham v. SchneeklothWashington Supreme Court · 1958

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Snyder v. LovercheckWyoming Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Mantle v. N. Star Energy & Constr. LLCWyoming Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Kirkwood v. Cuna Mutual Ins. SocietyWyoming Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Lee v. LPP Mortgage Ltd.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Mathis v. WendlingWyoming Supreme Court · 1998

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API