Raymond v. Steen
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Justice.
The resolution of this case requires the application of our rules relating to summary judgment to the claim of James K. Raymond (Raymond) that he is entitled to have a description of certain lands in a contract for the sale of land reformed because of mutual mistake of fact. The land Raymond claims was incorrectly described was the subject of a right of first refusal by Raymond. In disposing of the ease by summary judgment, the district court ruled the seller, Donald M. Steen (Steen), had not received a bona fide offer from a third party, and Raymond’s right of first refusal…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Prudential Preferred Properties v. J and J Ventures, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1993
- Continental Insurance v. Page Engineering Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1989
- Bryant v. HornbuckleWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
- Lincoln v. Wackenhut Corp.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1994
- Prince v. Elm Inv. Co., Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1982
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Snyder v. LovercheckWyoming Supreme Court · 1999
- 40 North Corp. v. MorrellWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
- Frost Construction Co. v. Lobo, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1998
- Williams Gas Processing-Wamsutter Company v. Union Pacific Resources Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2001
- Bouwens v. CentriliftWyoming Supreme Court · 1999
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.