Legal Opinion

Rainbow Oil Co. v. Christmann

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1982No. 5734PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROSE, Chief Justice.

The present dispute arises out of a contractual relationship between Rainbow Oil Company, 1 the appellant, and John J. Christmann, 2 one of the appellees, in which Christmann brought suit seeking specific performance of the contract. Rainbow responded charging Christmann with breaching the agreement and seeking its reformation. In its judgment, the district court ordered specific performance, refused to reform and found generally in favor of the appellee and against the appellant in all respects. It is from this judgment that Rainbow Oil Company appeals.

THE FACTS

Rainbow…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Amoco Production Co. v. Stauffer Chemical Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Shepard v. Top Hat Land & Cattle Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Quin Blair Enterprises, Inc. v. Julien Construction Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Fuchs Murane v. GoeWyoming Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Bulis v. WellsWyoming Supreme Court · 1977

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Amoco Production Co. v. EM Nominee Partnership Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Union Pacific Resources Co. v. Texaco, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Dewey v. WentlandWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Comet Energy Services, LLC v. Powder River Oil & Gas Ventures LLCWyoming Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Williams Gas Processing-Wamsutter Company v. Union Pacific Resources Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2001

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API