Legal Opinion

Chiapetta v. Clark Associates

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided February 25, 1987PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLIFFORD, Justice.

The plaintiff, Salvador Chiapetta, appeals a judgment entered in the Superior Court, Cumberland County, dismissing his complaint on the ground that the action was barred by the six-year statute of limitations imposed by 14 M.R.S.A. § 752 (1980). We agree with the Superior Court’s determination that on the face of the complaint the plaintiff’s cause of action arose at the latest on the date of the fire destroying his Scarborough clam-processing plant, but vacate the judgment of dismissal and remand to the Superior Court for further determination under M.R.Civ.P. 56 regarding…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Myrick v. JamesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
  2. Austin v. Fulton Insurance CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Kunz v. Buckeye Union Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Bernier v. Raymark Industries, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1986
  5. Anderson v. NealSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Nevin v. Union Trust Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
  2. Down East Energy Corp. v. Niagara Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
  3. Rared Manchester NH LLC v. Rite Aid of New Hampshire IncCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
  4. Kasu Corp. v. Blake, Hall & Sprague, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1990
  5. McKinnon v. Honeywell International, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API