Myrick v. James
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
CARTER, Justice.
In Tantish v. Szendey, 158 Me. 228, 182 A.2d 660 (1962), this Court held that a foreign-object surgical malpractice action accrues, for the purpose of determining when the statute of limitations commences, at the time of the negligent act. In so holding, we conformed to the then contemporary weight of authority and expressly rejected the proposition that such an action accrues only when the patient becomes aware or has reason to be aware of the physician’s alleged failure to remove the foreign-object from his body in the course of surgery. For the reasons set forth herein, we…
2Cases cited76 opinions
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Desist v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Helvering v. HallockSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by104 opinions
- Tuttle v. RaymondSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
- Bernier v. Raymark Industries, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1986
- State v. SchofieldSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005
- Choroszy v. TsoSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
- Nevin v. Union Trust Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
99 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.