Legal Opinion

Kunz v. Buckeye Union Ins.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 21, 1982No. 81-1705PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Per curiam

The issues posed within this cause are two-fold. The first query is whether the allegations in appellants’ complaint sound in tort and are governed by R.C. 2305.09, the statute of limitations for certain tort claims, or whether the allegations sound in contract and are governed by R.C. 2305.07, the statute of limitations for actions upon a contract not in writing. Second, where such insurance as acquired by the agent for the insured is not as requested by the insured, when does a cause of action accrue for the failure to procure the coverage as requested.

The Court of Appeals determined that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Peterson v. TeodosioOhio Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Austin v. Fulton Insurance CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Squire, Supt. v. Grn. Trust Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1947
  4. State Ex Rel. Lien v. HouseOhio Supreme Court · 1944

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Hambleton v. R.G. Barry Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Hickox v. StoverSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. O'Stricker v. Jim Walter Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Oliver v. Kaiser Community Health FoundationOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Collins v. SotkaOhio Supreme Court · 1998

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API