Legal Opinion

Kasu Corp. v. Blake, Hall & Sprague, Inc.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided November 29, 1990PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WATHEN, Justice.

Plaintiff Kasu Corp. appeals from an entry of a summary judgment in favor of defendant Blake, Hall & Sprague, Inc. in the Superior Court (Cumberland County, Fritzscke, J.). Relying on the so-called “discovery rule,” plaintiff argues on appeal that the six-year statute of limitations controlling its complaint had not run, and the court’s ruling should be reversed. We disagree and affirm the Superior Court’s grant of summary judgment.

Plaintiff is a defunct corporation formerly in the business of selling and installing swimming pools. From 1970-78, plaintiff obtained liability…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Myrick v. JamesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
  2. Bernier v. Raymark Industries, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1986
  3. Anderson v. NealSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  4. Chiapetta v. Clark AssociatesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1987
  5. Burke v. Hamilton Beach Division, Scovill Manufacturing Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Down East Energy Corp. v. Niagara Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
  2. MORGAN v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSUR. CO.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2021
  3. Palmero v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
  4. Campbell v. MacHias Savings BankDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1994
  5. Dunelawn Owners' Ass'n v. GendreauSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API