Legal Opinion
McKinnon v. Honeywell International, Inc.
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided July 16, 2009No. Docket: Yor-06-670PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtClifford, J.
[¶ 1] John McKinnon appeals from a summary judgment in favor of Honeywell International, Inc. entered in the Superior Court (York County, Fritzsche, J.) on his putative class action complaint alleging that Honeywell violated the Maine Unfair Trade Practices Act (UTPA), 5 M.R.S. §§ 205-A to 214 (2008), and Maine’s antitrust statute governing monopolies and profiteering, 10 M.R.S. §§ 1101-1110 (2008), by preventing competition for, and misrepresenting trademark status on, its circular thermostats. Among other contentions, McKinnon challenges the court’s conclusion that the applicable statute of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Bigelow v. RKO Radio Pictures, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Klehr v. A. O. Smith Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- In Re New Motor Vehicles Can. Export Anti. Lit.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
- Alabama v. Blue Bird Body Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Bartner v. CarterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Anderson v. Hannaford Bros. Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
- Pleasantdale Condominiums, LLC v. WakefieldCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2022
- In re Opana ER Antritrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
- Drilling & Blasting Rock Specialists, Inc. v. Paul RheaumeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2016
- In Re Hannaford Bros. Co. Customer Data Security Breach LitigationDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2009
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.