Legal Opinion

Dichello v. Holgrath Corp.

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided July 7, 1998No. AC 16386PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HEALEY, J.

The plaintiff appeals from the decision of the compensation review board (board) affirming the commissioner’s award of reimbursement for disability payments made to the plaintiff. We affirm the decision of the board.

A brief overview of the background is appropriate at this point. On May 7, 1984, the plaintiff, Esterina Dichello, and the defendant Holgrath Corporation entered into a voluntary agreement, approved by the workers’ compensation commissioner, which provided that the plaintiff had a 30 percent loss of use of her right hand as the result of a compensable event that…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Castro v. VieraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  2. Heyman Associates No. 1 v. Insurance Co. of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  3. Wadia Enterprises, Inc. v. HirschfeldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  4. Novella v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  5. Hayes v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Rana v. TerdjanianConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
  2. Bidoae v. Hartford Golf ClubConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  3. Lucarelli v. Freedom of Information CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
  4. Statewide Grievance Committee v. BrownConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  5. Foote v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API